A raw Erlang calculator answers one question: given so many Erlangs of offered traffic and a grade of service target, how many channels? Designing a real trunked land mobile radio network needs the questions around that answer joined up. How much traffic does a fleet of talkgroups actually generate? What grade of service matters when call grants queue rather than clear? How do the required channels become RF carriers and licensed spectrum for the technology in question? And how does all of that distribute across a multi site network. The LMR Trunked System Planner is the layer that ties talkgroups, grade of service, channel count, carriers, spectrum and site loading together, sitting on top of the Erlang B and C engines rather than duplicating them.
Offered traffic is built the way trunked radio actually behaves. Members drive a busy hour push to talk rate, and a group transmission occupies a single traffic channel however many members are listening, so traffic scales with the arrival rate rather than the group size. Transmission trunking releases the channel between overs; message trunking holds it through the inter over dead air for the whole conversation, and the tool models the difference explicitly. The channel pool is then sized against the grade of service that matters for a queued system: an Erlang C access time target, the probability that a grant is served within a target number of seconds, with Erlang B blocking available for message trunked or no queue systems.
From the channel requirement the planner produces a deployable answer. It maps traffic channels onto physical RF carriers and paired transmit and receive spectrum for P25 Phase 1 FDMA, P25 Phase 2 TDMA, DMR Tier III and TETRA, accounting for the control channel each technology carries. Across a network it separates independent multisite cells, each sized on its own traffic and needing its own frequencies, from simulcast pools that are sized once on the combined traffic of their member sites and reuse one carrier set everywhere. The roll up distinguishes the distinct frequencies to licence from the carriers physically deployed, flags the worst loaded site, compares the four technologies for the same channel requirement, and runs a growth analysis that reports the extra channels needed at a horizon and the years of runway before the current plan breaches its grade of service.