Insights
RF Engineering · · 14 min read

dBm to Watts, dBi vs dBd and dBc: Every RF Decibel Explained (with Conversion Tables)

dBm to Watts, dBi vs dBd and dBc: Every RF Decibel Explained (with Conversion Tables)

The Short Answer

A decibel is a ratio, not a power. On its own, dB tells you how much bigger or smaller one quantity is than another: every +10 dB is ten times the power, every +3 dB is roughly double, and every −3 dB is roughly half. Suffixes turn that ratio into an absolute figure by naming the reference. dBm is power referenced to one milliwatt, so 0 dBm = 1 mW and +30 dBm = 1 watt. dBW is the same idea referenced to one watt, so dBW = dBm − 30. dBi and dBd are antenna gain referenced to an isotropic radiator and to a half-wave dipole respectively, and they differ by a fixed 2.15 dB (dBi = dBd + 2.15). dBc is a level relative to the carrier, used for spurious emissions and phase noise. Get those references straight and almost every RF number on a datasheet falls into place.

At a Glance: What Each Unit Is Measured Against

Before any formulas, the whole system fits on a postcard. A bare decibel is only a ratio; every suffix simply names what that ratio is measured against:

dB    =  a ratio only (a gain or a loss)

dBm   =  power referenced to 1 mW
dBW   =  power referenced to 1 W

dBi   =  antenna gain referenced to an isotropic radiator
dBd   =  antenna gain referenced to a half-wave dipole

dBc   =  a level referenced to the carrier

Two things make this worth the trouble. Logarithms turn the multiplying gains and losses of a signal chain into plain addition, and they compress a huge range of powers, where a transmitter and the faint signal a receiver recovers can differ by 150 dB (a factor of 10^15), into a handful of tidy numbers.

dBm to Watts: Quick Reference

dBmPowerTypical example
−100 dBm0.1 pWAround a receiver noise floor
−90 dBm1 pWNear the edge of Wi-Fi usability
−70 dBm100 pWStrong Wi-Fi signal (RSSI)
−30 dBm1 µWLow-level test signal
0 dBm1 mWThe reference point
+10 dBm10 mWBluetooth class 2
+20 dBm100 mWWi-Fi / low-power link
+30 dBm1 WHandheld UHF radio
+40 dBm10 WMobile or base radio
+43 dBm20 W
+50 dBm100 W
+60 dBm1 kWHigh-power transmitter

Notice the pattern: every 10 dBm step multiplies or divides the power by ten, and a 3 dB step doubles or halves it. Once you have anchored 0 dBm = 1 mW and +30 dBm = 1 W, you can reach almost any value in your head by stepping in tens and threes.

The signal-strength examples are indicative only. Real-world Wi-Fi performance depends on bandwidth, modulation, interference and receiver sensitivity, so treat figures such as around −70 dBm for a strong connection and around −90 dBm near the edge of usability as a rough guide rather than a hard rule.

dB vs dBm: Ratio versus Absolute

This is the single distinction that causes the most confusion, so it is worth stating plainly. dB describes a change or a relationship. An amplifier with 20 dB of gain makes its output 100 times the power of its input, whatever that input happens to be. A cable with 3 dB of loss halves whatever passes through it. There is no actual power in a “dB” figure, only a factor.

dBm describes a real power level, because the reference is fixed at one milliwatt. When you add a dB figure to a dBm figure you get a new dBm figure: 0 dBm into a 20 dB amplifier gives +20 dBm out. What you cannot do is treat two dBm readings as if they were dB and add them: two transmitters of +30 dBm each do not make +60 dBm, they make +33 dBm, because adding two equal powers is a 3 dB increase, not a doubling of the decibel number. More on that trap below.

The Decibel Formula

For a power ratio, the decibel value is ten times the base-ten logarithm of the ratio:

dB = 10 · log₁₀(P₂ / P₁)

For an amplitude ratio, such as voltage, current, or field strength, you use twenty times the logarithm, because power is proportional to the square of amplitude and the square comes out of the log as a factor of two:

dB = 20 · log₁₀(V₂ / V₁)

A 6 dB change is the same decibel figure whichever quantity you are measuring, but it works out to a factor of 2 in voltage or field strength and a factor of 4 in power, precisely because power is proportional to amplitude squared. Mixing up the 10 and the 20 is one of the most common slips in RF maths, so it pays to ask “am I working in power or in amplitude?” before reaching for the log.

To convert dBm to and from milliwatts directly:

P (mW) = 10^(dBm / 10) and dBm = 10 · log₁₀(P in mW)

And to convert dBm to watts, subtract 30 first because a watt is a thousand milliwatts:

P (W) = 10^((dBm − 30) / 10)

For a worked example, convert +37 dBm, a common handheld radio output, to watts:

P(W) = 10^((37 − 30) / 10)
     = 10^0.7
     ≈ 5 W

So +37 dBm is about 5 watts. The recipe runs the other way just as easily: a 5 W signal is 10 · log₁₀(5000 mW) ≈ +37 dBm.

The Numbers Worth Memorising

ChangePower factorVoltage / field factor
+10 dB×10×3.16
+6 dB×4×2
+3 dB×2 (double)×1.41
+1 dB×1.26×1.12
0 dB×1×1
−3 dB÷2 (half)×0.71
−6 dB÷4÷2
−10 dB÷10÷3.16
−20 dB÷100÷10

These few values cover most field work. Because decibels add, you can build any factor from them: +13 dB is +10 dB then +3 dB, so ×10 then ×2, which is ×20. A 60 dB span, the kind of dynamic range a receiver routinely handles, is a factor of one million in power, which is exactly why the industry uses logarithms in the first place.

dBm and dBW: Absolute Power

dBm is power referenced to one milliwatt and is the everyday unit of RF power, from a −110 dBm received signal to a +50 dBm transmitter output. dBW is referenced to one watt instead, and turns up in radar, satellite and broadcast work where powers are larger. The two are the same scale shifted by 1000, which is 30 dB:

dBW = dBm − 30 and dBm = dBW + 30

So 0 dBW = 1 W = +30 dBm, and a 100 W transmitter is +50 dBm or +20 dBW. Pick whichever keeps the numbers convenient; just label them, because an unlabelled “50” could be a hundred watts or a hundred kilowatts depending on whether someone meant dBm or dBW.

dBi vs dBd: Antenna Gain

Antenna gain is also a ratio, so it needs a reference too, and there are two in common use. dBi compares the antenna to an isotropic radiator, a theoretical point source that radiates equally in every direction. dBd compares it to a real half-wave dipole. A dipole itself has a gain of 2.15 dBi, so the two scales are offset by that fixed amount:

Gain (dBi) = Gain (dBd) + 2.15

A “6 dBd” collinear is therefore an “8.15 dBi” antenna, the same piece of hardware described against a different yardstick. Datasheets are not always explicit about which they quote, and the 2.15 dB difference is enough to matter in a tight link budget or a compliance calculation, so confirm the reference before you trust the number. For circularly polarised antennas you will also see dBic, gain relative to an isotropic source of the same polarisation.

AntennaTypical gain
Isotropic (reference)0 dBi
Half-wave dipole2.15 dBi (0 dBd)
Quarter-wave ground-plane whip2 to 3 dBi
Collinear (mobile / base)5 to 9 dBi
Yagi (5 to 10 elements)10 to 16 dBi
Panel / sector14 to 18 dBi
Small grid or dish20 to 30 dBi
Large parabolic30 to 45 dBi

Putting the Units Together: EIRP

The reason the references matter is that they combine. The power a system actually radiates in its main beam is the effective isotropic radiated power, and in decibels it is just an addition:

EIRP (dBm) = Transmitter power (dBm) + Antenna gain (dBi) − Feeder and connector loss (dB)

Take a 10 W transmitter, which is +40 dBm, feeding 2 dB of cable loss into a 16 dBi antenna. The EIRP is 40 − 2 + 16 = +54 dBm, which is about 251 W. The transmitter only makes 10 W, but the antenna concentrates it, so the effective figure in the beam is far higher. If the gain had been quoted in dBd you would convert it first, or you would be reporting ERP (effective radiated power, dipole-referenced) instead, which is 2.15 dB lower than EIRP for the same antenna.

Because every unit in that line is logarithmic, a whole radio link reads as one running tally of additions and subtractions, which is the real reason RF works in decibels at all:

  TX power          +40 dBm   (10 W)
        │
  TX feeder loss     −2 dB
        │
  TX antenna gain   +16 dBi
        ▼
  EIRP              +54 dBm   (≈ 251 W)
        │
  Path loss        −130 dB
        │
  RX antenna gain   +16 dBi
        │
  RX feeder loss     −2 dB
        ▼
  RX signal         −62 dBm

Compare that −62 dBm received level with the receiver’s sensitivity of, say, −95 dBm, and the 33 dB gap is your fade margin, all worked out by adding and subtracting rather than multiplying a string of awkward fractions. This single chain is the backbone of every coverage prediction, every link budget, and every RF exposure assessment.

Adding Powers: The Trap

Because decibels are logarithmic, you cannot add two dBm figures directly. To combine two power levels, convert each back to milliwatts, add them, and convert the total to dBm. The shortcut worth remembering is that two equal powers sum to 3 dB above either one: two +30 dBm carriers combine to +33 dBm, not +60 dBm. Two unequal signals add by less than 3 dB, and when one is more than about 10 dB below the other it barely moves the total at all. This is exactly the maths behind combining transmitters, summing interference from several sources, or working out cumulative RF exposure from a multi-carrier site.

Common Mistakes

  • Treating dB as dBm. “20 dB” is a factor; “20 dBm” is 100 mW. Gain and loss are in dB; power levels are in dBm or dBW.
  • Adding dBm values like dB. Two +30 dBm sources make +33 dBm, not +60 dBm. Convert to linear, add, convert back.
  • Using 10·log when you should use 20·log. Power ratios use 10; voltage, current and field-strength ratios use 20.
  • Ignoring the dBi/dBd reference. A gain figure is 2.15 dB different depending on the reference, which can quietly swing a link budget or push a compliance result over a limit.
  • Confusing dBµV with dBm. They are both “dB”, but one is a voltage scale and one is a power scale; the conversion depends on the system impedance.
  • Dropping the sign on losses. A 3 dB attenuator is −3 dB in a budget. Lose track of the sign and your received level comes out wildly optimistic.

Going Further: Less Common Decibel References

The units above cover most day-to-day RF work. The ones below are the references you will still meet on datasheets and test equipment, grouped here so the core stays uncluttered. Any time you see “dB” with letters after it, the letters name the reference:

UnitReferenceWhat it expresses
dBcThe carrier powerSpurious, harmonics, phase noise, intermodulation
dBFSDigital full scaleLevels in ADCs, DACs and SDRs
dBµV1 microvoltVoltage level (EMC, cable TV)
dB-Hz1 hertz of bandwidthCarrier-to-noise density, C/N₀
dBsm1 square metreRadar cross-section
dBm/Hz1 mW in a 1 Hz bandPower spectral density, such as the noise floor

dBc appears all over transmitter specifications. A harmonic quoted at “−60 dBc” sits 60 dB, a factor of a million, below the carrier. Phase noise, spurious emissions and intermodulation products are all referenced this way because what matters is their size relative to the wanted signal, not their absolute power. dBµV trips people up in a different way: in a 50 Ω system, 0 dBm corresponds to about 107 dBµV, so the two scales are offset by roughly that amount, which is why EMC and broadcast engineers live in dBµV while radio engineers live in dBm.

The Noise Floor in Decibels

The same add-and-subtract trick gives the thermal noise floor, the faint background against which every signal has to compete. At room temperature the noise power density is −174 dBm/Hz, so the noise in a given channel is that figure plus the bandwidth expressed in decibels relative to one hertz. In a 1 MHz channel:

Noise floor = −174 dBm/Hz + 10 · log₁₀(1,000,000 Hz) = −174 + 60 = −114 dBm

Widen the channel and the noise rises 3 dB for every doubling of bandwidth, then the receiver’s own noise figure adds on top to give the real sensitivity floor. This is the level a received signal has to clear, which is why a link budget is only finished once you have compared the received level against it.

Doing the Conversions in noIM₃

The dB conversion calculator handles the everyday work in both directions: dBm to watts and milliwatts, dB to a linear power or voltage ratio, and back again, with the 10·log and 20·log cases kept separate so you do not have to remember which applies. It is the fastest way to sanity-check a datasheet figure or a meter reading.

When you are combining the units rather than just converting them, the EIRP calculator adds transmitter power, antenna gain and feeder loss into a single radiated figure and lets you switch between dBi and dBd cleanly, so the 2.15 dB offset is handled for you. The link budget calculator carries those numbers through path loss to a received level and a fade margin, while the noise floor calculator and the signal-to-noise calculator close the loop by telling you whether that received level actually clears the noise by enough to work.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I convert dBm to watts? Subtract 30 and divide by 10, then raise ten to that power: P (W) = 10^((dBm − 30) / 10). So +30 dBm is 1 W, +40 dBm is 10 W, and +50 dBm is 100 W. To go the other way, P (W) to dBm, use dBm = 10·log₁₀(P in watts) + 30.

What is the difference between dB and dBm? dB is a ratio with no fixed reference, so it describes a gain or a loss. dBm is an absolute power referenced to one milliwatt, so it describes a real signal level. You add a dB figure to a dBm figure and get a dBm figure; you never add two dBm figures as though they were dB.

What is the difference between dBi and dBd? Both are antenna gain, but dBi is referenced to an isotropic radiator and dBd to a half-wave dipole. A dipole has a gain of 2.15 dBi, so dBi = dBd + 2.15. Always check which reference a datasheet uses, because the 2.15 dB difference matters in a link budget.

Is 0 dBm a lot of power? No. 0 dBm is one milliwatt, a small but very common reference level. Handheld radios run around +30 to +37 dBm (1 to 5 W), while receivers routinely work with signals well below −90 dBm.

Can I add two dBm values together? Not directly. Convert each to milliwatts, add them, and convert the sum back to dBm. Two equal powers combine to 3 dB above either one, so two +30 dBm signals make +33 dBm.

What does +3 dB mean? A 3 dB increase is roughly a doubling of power (and a −3 dB decrease is roughly a halving). For voltage or field strength, 3 dB is a factor of about 1.41, because amplitude uses the 20·log relationship.

What is dBc? dBc is a level measured relative to the carrier power. A spurious emission at −50 dBc is 50 dB below the carrier. It is used for harmonics, spurious products, intermodulation and phase noise, where the size relative to the wanted signal is what counts.

Key Takeaway

Remember three numbers: 0 dBm = 1 mW, +30 dBm = 1 W, and +3 dB is roughly double the power. Once those are second nature, the suffix simply names the reference, and most RF calculations come down to addition and subtraction.

Related Insights

Continue reading

How to Calculate an RF Link Budget: A Step by Step Guide with a Worked Example
RF Engineering

How to Calculate an RF Link Budget: A Step by Step Guide with a Worked Example

A link budget adds every gain and subtracts every loss between a transmitter and a receiver to predict the received power, then compares it against the receiver sensitivity to see whether the link will work. Here is the formula, an at a glance budget table, a worked example for a 5.8 GHz point to point link, and the engineering considerations, fade margin, propagation and noise, that decide whether the design survives in service.

Jun 23, 2026

What Is a Good VSWR? VSWR, Return Loss and Reflected Power Explained
RF Engineering

What Is a Good VSWR? VSWR, Return Loss and Reflected Power Explained

A good VSWR is usually 1.5:1 or better, and 2:1 is the common acceptance limit. Here is what VSWR actually measures, how it converts to return loss, reflection coefficient and reflected power, a conversion table, target values by application, and the real reasons a high VSWR matters.

Jun 18, 2026